|
2013-01-31
| ||
| 21:00 | • Closed ticket [e4c8121f7b]: SQLiteFunction class inspects all loaded assemblies plus 3 other changes artifact: 3e086aed00 user: mistachkin | |
| 20:59 | Merge SQLiteFunction changes to trunk. See ticket [e4c8121f7b]. check-in: 7048c61d62 user: mistachkin tags: trunk | |
| 07:46 | • Pending ticket [e4c8121f7b]: SQLiteFunction class inspects all loaded assemblies plus 2 other changes artifact: 938b11cf0d user: mistachkin | |
|
2013-01-29
| ||
| 23:00 | • Ticket [e4c8121f7b]: 5 changes artifact: 40c9e949cf user: mistachkin | |
| 20:57 | • Ticket [e4c8121f7b]: 3 changes artifact: d07e01dc9e user: mistachkin | |
| 20:20 | • Ticket [e4c8121f7b]: 3 changes artifact: 19eebc304f user: mistachkin | |
| 19:58 | • Ticket [e4c8121f7b]: 6 changes artifact: 1c6f24dbbd user: mistachkin | |
| 10:30 | • New ticket [e4c8121f7b]. artifact: 634eb310b0 user: anonymous | |
| Ticket Hash: | e4c8121f7bdf88411362b6ba835658b47354a1e1 | ||
| Title: | SQLiteFunction class inspects all loaded assemblies | ||
| Status: | Closed | Type: | Feature_Request |
| Severity: | Minor | Priority: | NextRelease |
| Subsystem: | Custom_Function | Resolution: | Fixed |
| Last Modified: |
2013-01-31 21:00:48 13.20 years ago |
Created: |
2013-01-29 10:30:29 13.21 years ago |
| Version Found In: | 1.0.84.0 | ||
| User Comments: | ||||
anonymous added on 2013-01-29 10:30:29:
I tried to upgrade my database using the FluentMigrator in the separate AppDomain to unload it with all unnecessary migrating dlls after the migration. I hoped that only necessary dlls will be loaded. All libraries has been loaded by SQLite (static constructor of SQLiteFunction). I suppose the decision has been made by design. So I have following question/sugestion: Should SQLiteFunction always scan all dlls? In most simple scenarios people don't use functions. I suggest there should be an option to disable this behaviour which causes side affects. mistachkin added on 2013-01-29 19:58:13:
Are you asking for the ability to disable detection of all SQLiteFunction implementation classes at runtime? mistachkin added on 2013-01-29 20:57:23:
The prototype for this new feature is here. mistachkin added on 2013-01-31 21:00:48:
Fixed in trunk by check-in [7048c61d62]. | ||||